Legal Opinion

McPeake v. Cannon, Esquire, PC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1989No. 173PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal arises from the order of August 26, 1987, granting appellee’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellants’ complaint with prejudice. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s preliminary objections because the complaint set forth a valid claim of legal malpractice. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order below.

On January 11, 1985, appellants’ decedent was arrested for burglary, rape, indecent assault, corrupting the morals of a minor, and possession of an instrument of crime. Decedent retained the legal services of appellee…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. McLaughlin v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Eisel v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Rowe v. MarderDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Fiorentino v. RapoportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API