Legal Opinion
Baur v. Veneman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 16, 2003No. Docket No. 02-6249PublishedCited by 286 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge POOLER dissents in a separate opinion.
STRAUB, Circuit Judge.
This appeal centers on a narrow issue of standing in the context of a category of progressive neurological diseases, Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (“TSEs”), of which the most widely publicized example is Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (“BSE,” commonly known as “mad cow” disease), a fatal neuro-degen-erative disease that affects the central nervous system of adult cattle.1 Plaintiff, *628Michael Baur (“Baur”), has filed suit to require defendants, Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, and the United States…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by286 opinions
- Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Cacchillo v. Insmed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.