Legal Opinion

Ericsson GE Mobile Communications Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 22, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 91-09-00703; Court No. 92-04-00272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*72Opinion

Carman, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Incorporated1 (collectively “Murata”) and others (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) remand decision in Final Scope Remand — Antidumping Duty Order on Cellular Mobile Telephones and Subassemblies from Japan: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (dated June 17, 1996) (Final Scope Remand). Plaintiffs argue Murata’s independently-traded cellular mobile telephone (“CMT”) components should be found outside the scope of the antidumping…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  3. King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API