Ericsson GE Mobile Communications Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
*72Opinion
Carman, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Incorporated1 (collectively “Murata”) and others (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) remand decision in Final Scope Remand — Antidumping Duty Order on Cellular Mobile Telephones and Subassemblies from Japan: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (dated June 17, 1996) (Final Scope Remand). Plaintiffs argue Murata’s independently-traded cellular mobile telephone (“CMT”) components should be found outside the scope of the antidumping…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010