Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 29, 1998No. Consolidated Court No. 96-08-01909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff, the Torrington Company (“Tor-rington”), brings this motion pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record. Torrington challenges certain *37final scope determinations1 of the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), excluding center bracket assemblies (“CBAs”) imported from Japan by Dana Corporation (“Dana”) and cushion suspension units (“CSUs”) imported from Japan and Singapore by Rockwell International Corporation (“Rockwell”) from the scope of the antidumping duty orders…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API