Legal Opinion

Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 28, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-150. No. 97-10-01913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2. The Plaintiff, Eckstrom Industries, Inc. (“Eckstrom”), challenges the determination of the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) that east stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings imported by Eckstrom are within the scope of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Taiwan. See Amended Final Determination and Anti-dumping Duty Order: Certain Welded Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan, 58 Fed.Reg. 33,250 (Dep’t…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. New England Tank Industries of New Hampshire, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Permagrain Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. SMA Surfaces, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  5. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API