Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Poole
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
The four portions of the charge complained of sought to define “total disability” within the meaning of the policy. The kind of disability insured against was defined in the insuring agreements of the policy as that which disabled “the insured from performing each and every duty pertaining to his business or occupation.” This term, “business or occupation,” is not ambiguous, arad the court should have simply instructed the jury that, if they found from the evidence that the plaintiff was disabled from performing each and every duty of his business or occupation, a recovery…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Hunter v. Federal Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- National Life Insurance v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Grady County v. BankerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Pippin v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Businessmen's Assurance Co. of America v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Cook v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Key Life Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. BurnsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.