Legal Opinion

Gashette v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1955No. 6170PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

William M. Gashette, petitioner, filed with this court a petition for certiorari in a matter involving a phase of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, A.C.A.1939, § 56-901 et seq. Because the Industrial Commission of Arizona was named as defendant insurance carrier the writ was, as a routine matter, issued, and the Commission in obedience to the writ sent up the record and filed a written response together with a motion to quash the writ of certiorari theretofore issued.

Ordinarily we do not write opinions in disposing of motions, but where, as here, a jurisdictional question is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sorenson v. Six Companies, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Duncan v. Superior Court of Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Williams v. Bankers National InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. McCluskey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Goodrich v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. PariseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API