Legal Opinion
Mein v. Pool Co. Disabled International Employee Long Term Disability Benefit Plan
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 8, 1998No. Civil Action 96-B-1095PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In this action for violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., defendants Pool Company Disabled International Employee Long Term Disability Benefit Plan (Plan) and Pool Company, Inc. (Company) (collectively, defendants) move to dismiss the state law claims of plaintiff Edward Mein (Mein) for tortious bad faith (claim one), intentional interference (claim three), infliction of emotional distress (claim four), and deceit (claim five). Defendants also move for summary judgment on claims two and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Mcdonald v. Western-Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Constantine v. American Airlines Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- Jones v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1999
- King v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- McDonald v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.