Ocel v. City of Eagan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case raises the same main issue decided today in Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Company, 402 N.W.2d 528 (Minn.1987), namely: when does the 2-year statute of limitations begin to run on a contribution claim arising from a defective improvement to real estate? Following Bulau, we hold that the statute of limitations begins to run on discovery of the defective and unsafe condition, and that Minn.Stat. § 541.051 (1986) is applicable to the facts of this case and bars the contribution action. We reverse the contrary court of appeals’ ruling.
On March 8, 1978, a meeting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Ocel v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.