Legal Opinion
Ocel v. City of Eagan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 24, 1986No. C6-86-369PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The City of Eagan appeals from a summary judgment which determined that its third-party action against the designers and builders of a storm sewer was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Thomas and Linda Ocel commenced an action against the City of Eagan on June 20, 1979, alleging the city negligently constructed a storm sewer which discharges runoff surface water onto their property. Between May 14 and June 1, 1981, the city commenced a third-party action against Gabbert Development; Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Altermatt v. Arlan's Department Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ocel v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Interest of HernandezNebraska Supreme Court · 1977