Legal Opinion
Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1991No. C0-90-2056PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
The trial court granted third-party defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The third-party plaintiff appeals.
FACTS
Minnesota Landmarks contracted with M.A. Mortenson Company, a general contractor, to renovate the Landmark Center in St. Paul, Minnesota. Subsequently, Landmarks and Mortenson modified the original contract to include removal of the existing skylight and installation of a new skylight.
Mortenson entered into a subcontract agreement with EPI Architectural Systems, Inc., to replace the existing skylights. EPI then purchased the tempered glass skylight units…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Ocel v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Bogatzki v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Sarafolean v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Frederick v. Sun 1031, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Crookston v. Agassiz Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.