Legal Opinion

State v. Deitman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1987No. 20584PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal from convictions of burglary 1 and theft. 2 They raise as their single issue that the evidence should have been suppressed on the ground that police officers had insufficient probable cause to effectuate a stop. We affirm.

In the early morning hours of March 1, 1984, a burglar alarm sounded at International Video in Salt Lake City. Officers arriving at the scene observed a white pickup truck, with a camper attached, pull away from the curb across the street from the shop. One of the officers followed this truck until it stopped in front of a residence a few blocks away. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhittenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. United States v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SwaniganUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. CarpenaUtah Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. AlverezUtah Supreme Court · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API