State v. Deitman
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal from convictions of burglary 1 and theft. 2 They raise as their single issue that the evidence should have been suppressed on the ground that police officers had insufficient probable cause to effectuate a stop. We affirm.
In the early morning hours of March 1, 1984, a burglar alarm sounded at International Video in Salt Lake City. Officers arriving at the scene observed a white pickup truck, with a camper attached, pull away from the curb across the street from the shop. One of the officers followed this truck until it stopped in front of a residence a few blocks away. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WhittenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SwaniganUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CarpenaUtah Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AlverezUtah Supreme Court · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.