Legal Opinion

State v. Carpena

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1986No. 20830, 20831PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants were arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) with intent to distribute for value. On motion of defendants, the charges were dismissed and the State appeals. Affirmed.

A police officer patrolling a neighborhood in which a rash of burglaries had recently occurred observed at 3:00 a.m. a slowly moving automobile with Arizona plates. Defendants and another man were in the vehicle. The officer did not observe any criminal or traffic offense, and no report of a burglary had been reported to the police that night. The police officer followed the car for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. SwaniganUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. SchlosserUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. State v. BruceUtah Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API