Film Follies, Inc. v. Haas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
In a suit for declaratory relief plaintiff contended that Oregon Laws 1973, ch 699 (hereafter Chapter 699), ORS 167.060(10), and ORS 167.085 violate the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as Art I, § 8 and Art IY, § 20 of the Oregon Constitution. Plaintiff asked that defendants be enjoined from enforcing the statutes. The circuit court declared the statutes constitutional and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff appeals. ORS 28.070.
Plaintiff first asserts that Chapter 699 ① and the related definition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. ChildsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Childs v. OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Gast v. State, by and Through StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. GrabillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.