McKinney v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The McKinneys appeal from an order holding that State Farm was not obligated to pay the default judgment they recovered against Herman Grantham. We affirm.
In April, 1968, while married, Betty Grantham and Herman Grantham purchased a Buick. After being refused insurance coverage on the automobile by one company because of the bad driving record of Herman, application for liability coverage was made in the name of Betty to an agency. She was listed as the applicant and Herman was listed as an additional operator. The application was processed through the assigned risk plan because of Herman's…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation v. BearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Rogers v. Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Bendall v. Home Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- EMPLOYERS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HollimanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Granite State Ins. Co. v. LoweCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Hunter v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Johnson v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.