Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1983No. 774PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

This appeal is another in a long series of appeals involving the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. 1009.101, et seq. (Hereafter referred to as the No-Fault Act). The instant appeal raises a very novel question: does a No-Fault policy remain in effect after the listed insured vehicle is no longer owned by the named insured and he has failed to make the required premium payments. To properly frame this issue, it is first necessary to gain an insight into the factual development of this case.

Kenneth Adams, a minor, co-owned with his father (Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Girard School District v. PittengerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Government Employees Insurance Company v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Paul v. DwyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Semple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Metro Transportation Co. v. North Star Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Madar v. League General InsuraceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Steel v. WeisbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API