Legal Opinion
Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation v. Bear
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 10, 1929No. 3 Div. 870PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
(after stating the case as above). The primary question involved is whether Lawrence Bear, Jr., is within the protection of the policy as an “additional assured,” under clause 6, commonly known as the “omnibus clause.” As appears from carefully prepared briefs and further research on our part, rather few cases construing such provisions in accident liability policies shed light on the issue presented by the facts of this ease.
In our own ease of Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. Blue, 121 So. 25, 1 one operating the car by permission of the wife of the assured, an adult member of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Whitney v. Employers Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Continental Fire Ins. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Associated Indemnity Corp. of San Francisco v. McAlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. PlummerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
- Indemnity Insurance v. JordanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.