Wild v. Deig
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Posey Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This was an action by the appellant to recover damages, and to restrain the appellees from tearing down his fences, and opening a pretended private road through his land.
Two questions .are presented for our consideration: 1st. The regularity of the proceedings of the board of county commissioners of Posey county in establishing the road. *4562d. The constitutionality of the law under which it was established.
The petition for the road was signed by twenty-nine freeholders of the county, six of whom resided in the immediate neighborhood of the proposed private road. It asked '“for the location of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sadler v. LanghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Bankhead v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Little v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Dickey v. TennisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Arnsperger v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.