Legal Opinion

Pfaff v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1886No. 11,258PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee owns, and for a number of years has owned, so'me small tracts of land, and some lots and parts of lots in the city of Indianapolis, aggregating about twelve acres. The purposes for, and the manner in which those lands and lots are and have been used, are stated in.the complaint as follows:

“
“ Plaintiff shows, that upon the above described portion of block 94, is situated its freight house, through which two tracks run, and on each side of which there are tracks belonging to plaintiffj connected with its main line of track situate on Louisiana street in said city of Indianapolis; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. CheyenneSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Williams v. Western Union Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. People ex rel. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Toledo & Wabash R. R. v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Salt Lake Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API