Hannula v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $30,000 for personal injury caused by the negligence of defendant’s servants. The case was tried before Fesler, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action to recover damages sustained by John M. Hannula, an infant, who was run over by an engine of the defendant; verdict for the defendant; plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The boy, John Hannula, was injured on November 14, 1902. He was born on July 29, 1897, and at the time of his injury was five years and three and one half months old. On February 6, 1903, something like three'months after the accident, the plaintiff’s father settled with the defendant, receiving $100 for himself and $600 for the boy. This action was commenced in February,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hess v. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Decker v. Itasca Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Picciano v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Lathrop v. SchutteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Johnson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Roberts v. RingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Cruz v. Central Pasto Viejo, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
- Hollander v. DietrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Pacheco v. DelgardoArizona Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.