Legal Opinion

Dane v. Schwan

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided February 17, 1989No. Case No. (Chancery) 108717Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE RICHARD J. JAMBORSKY

This matter is before the Court on Petitioners’ Motion for the Entry of a Permanent Injunction preventing the Defendant, acting in his individual capacity as a lot owner, from applying "tar and chip" paving to the roads in the Southdown neighborhood. Whether he should be enjoined from acting in his capacity as an officer of the Southdown Road Maintenance Fund, Inc., is not now before the Court. It is possible that he could so act were he properly authorized by the Southdown lot owners. For the reasons set forth below, the permanent injunction is granted.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Brock v. B & M Moster Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hotchkiss v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Littlefield v. HubbardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  5. Lorenc v. SwiderskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API