Legal Opinion

Lorenc v. Swiderski

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 16, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainants are the owners of premises adjoining those of the defendants and which are subject to an easement of way granted to the predecessors in title of the defendant in the following terms:

"The said Antoni Kalinski is to have the right for himself, his heirs and assigns, to use a nine-foot strip in common with the parties of the first part, their heirs and assigns, at the rear end of the lot to the east owned by the parties of the first part, giving a passageway to and from Hutchinson Place."

The defendants, without the consent of the complainants, began the construction of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. HubbardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Johnston v. HydeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
  3. Jaqui v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Hyland v. FondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Lidgerwood Estates v. Public Service, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Block v. GallagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API