Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. White River Area Agency on Aging

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 2005No. CA 05-476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Glenda Brotherton appeals from the denial of workers’ compensation benefits, arguing that the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in determining that she was not performing employment services for appellee White River Area Agency on Aging (“the agency”) when she was injured. Because we agree, we reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

Brotherton was employed by the agency and by Mary Jane Foster. Her duties for each involved serving as a personal-care aide for elderly or disabled individuals who lived with Foster. In total, five elderly or disabled women lived…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Collins v. Excel Specialty ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Whitlatch v. Southland Land & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clairday v. the Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Holland Group, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Brookshire Grocery Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Brotherton v. White River Area Agency on AgingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Clairday v. the Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API