Clairday v. the Lilly Co.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Olly Neal, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) decision that appellant, Phillip Clairday, failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to temporary-total-disability compensation after April 24, 2003. For reversal, appellant argues that there is no substantial basis supporting the Commission’s findings that the surgery he requested was not causally related to his April 30, 2002, work-related injury. We reverse and remand.
The facts are these. Appellant worked for appellee Lilly as a forklift technician, mechanic,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Poulan Weed Eater v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Mad Butcher, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin Charcoal, Inc. v. BrittCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Southeast Arkansas Human Development Center v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- King v. PeopleworksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- DeQueen Sand & Gravel Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. Tara RowlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.