Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clairday v. the Lilly Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 19, 2006No. CA 05-696Published

1Dissent

Robert J. Gladwin, Judge, Hart, Bird, Glover and Roaf, JJ., agree. Gladwin, Griffen, Vaught and Crabtree, JJ., dissent.

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. In reversing the Commission’s opinion, the majority has taken on the role of fact finder. The majority’s brief recitation of the facts is adequate. Our standard of review is clear. In reviewing the decisions of the Commission, this court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commission’s findings and affirms the decision ifit is supported by substantial evidence. Geo…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. StottsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Holloway v. Ray White Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API