Bettencourt v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action of tort for injuries sustained when the plaintiff, after traveling as a passenger on a bus owned and operated by the defendant, disembarked and stepped into a depression in the public street. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The only question raised by the defendant’s bill of exceptions *848with which we concern ourselves is the sufficiency of evidence to warrant a finding for the plaintiff, which was raised by the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and by its motion for entry of a verdict under leave reserved, both of which motions were denied. It is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Tefft v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Lee v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commerce Insurance v. Ultimate Livery Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Mlynarchik v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Tuite v. NaplesMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995