Legal Opinion

Bettencourt v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 3, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action of tort for injuries sustained when the plaintiff, after traveling as a passenger on a bus owned and operated by the defendant, disembarked and stepped into a depression in the public street. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The only question raised by the defendant’s bill of exceptions *848with which we concern ourselves is the sufficiency of evidence to warrant a finding for the plaintiff, which was raised by the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and by its motion for entry of a verdict under leave reserved, both of which motions were denied. It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Tefft v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Lee v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Commerce Insurance v. Ultimate Livery Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Mlynarchik v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Tuite v. NaplesMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API