Legal Opinion

McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries. The plaintiff became a passenger on a car of the defendant on Arsenal Street in Watertown. It is stated in the bill of exceptions: “The Charles River intersects Arsenal Street and over the river on Arsenal Street there is a bridge, connecting Arsenal Street, Watertown, with Market Street, Brighton. On April 29, 1925, and for some weeks before, the metropolitan district commission had been constructing a new bridge over the river, and it was necessary for passengers on electric cars coming from Watertown along Arsenal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Gurley v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Powers v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Tompkins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Wakeley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Head v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Brown v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Gast v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Bettencourt v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API