McManus v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries. The plaintiff became a passenger on a car of the defendant on Arsenal Street in Watertown. It is stated in the bill of exceptions: “The Charles River intersects Arsenal Street and over the river on Arsenal Street there is a bridge, connecting Arsenal Street, Watertown, with Market Street, Brighton. On April 29, 1925, and for some weeks before, the metropolitan district commission had been constructing a new bridge over the river, and it was necessary for passengers on electric cars coming from Watertown along Arsenal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Gurley v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Powers v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Tompkins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Wakeley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Head v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Brown v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Gast v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Bettencourt v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.