Legal Opinion

United States v. Norcees Ben Carrier

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1993No. 92-8058PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Norcees Ben Carrier appeals the district court’s order allowing testimony by closed circuit television for two child witnesses in his trial on sexual abuse charges. He contends that the district court did not make the findings necessary to authorize televised testimony under 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Lorenzo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Thomas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. Anita YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Boyd Dean WeekleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Torres-PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Bucher v. Richardson Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API