Gillies v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYegan, Acting P.J.
*909 "The purpose of the law of contracts is to protect the reasonable expectations of the parties." ( Ben - Zvi v. Edmar Co. (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 468 , 475, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 12 .) This principle applies to the law of "mortgages." A person who borrows money from a bank to purchase or refinance a home has a reasonable expectation that the bank will fund the loan. The bank has a reasonable expectation that monthly mortgage payments will be made. Here, appellant's reasonable expectations were met. The bank's were not. Nonpayment of the mortgage for approximately eight years while the borrower remains…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Douglas Gillies v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Gross v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In Re: Byron York PriestleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.