Douglas Gillies v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Douglas Gillies appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his adversary proceeding alleging pre-foreclo-sure related claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of res judica-ta. Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Gillies’s action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because Gillies either raised, or could have raised, his claims in his prior California state and federal court actions, which involved the same primary rights, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gillies v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017