Legal Opinion

Allison v. Sherburne Country Mobile Home Park

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1991No. C2-91-285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Michael Allison and Kathy Otten sued Sherburne Country Mobile Home Park (Sherburne) in conciliation court, claiming that Sherburne’s $7.50 monthly service charge for electricity violated Minn.Stat. § 327C.04 (1990). The conciliation court ordered judgment for Allison and Otten. Sherburne filed for removal to district court. The district court entered judgment for Allison, holding that Sherburne’s service fee for supplying electricity to its tenants violated Minn.Stat. § 327C.04, subd. 4. On appeal, Sherburne challenges the district court’s application of the statute to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Kachman v. BlosbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Yost v. MillhouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. Shu Dian PengCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. In re the Marriage of Hamann v. HamannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API