Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hamann v. Hamann

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1992No. C2-91-1520Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Eight years after dissolution of the parties’ marriage, appellant Sandra Hamann moved for increased child support and an *752order permitting her to collect support through income withholding. The trial court denied appellant's motions without findings of fact on the modification proposal. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The parties were married in 1963 and had four children. In a 1983 judgment dissolving the marriage, the trial court ordered respondent Ronald Hamann to pay weekly benefits worth $260 per month for permanent ongoing child support. At that time, respondent was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Royal-Milbank Insurance Co. v. BusseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Allison v. Sherburne Country Mobile Home ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Erickson v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API