Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Pennzoil Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1939No. Appeal, 244PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellee brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered in alighting from appellant’s motor truck, alleging that the negligence of the driver as ap pellant’s servant was the proximate cause of the accident. Ownership of the truck was admitted, but appellant asserted that at the time of the accident the driver was the servant of an independent contractor; Arthur G. McKee & Company, and that the truck was then in the latter’s exclusive control. It was also contended that appellee was a trespasser on the vehicle. At the trial it appeared that appellant had entered into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Holzheimer v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Brooks v. Buckley & BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Carruth v. Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Grande v. Wooleyhan Transport Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. DeWaele v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API