Legal Opinion

Grande v. Wooleyhan Transport Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1945No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by.

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is a suit in trespass brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of the negligence of defendant. At the trial the jury disagreed, whereupon the trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment on the whole record, under the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70, on the ground that plaintiff was negligent as a matter of law, and judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

The entry of judgment for defendant was not proper unless the testimony disclosed a case in which binding instructions for the defendant would have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Johnson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Meitner v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Stevens v. AllcuttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Freedman v. ZiccardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kline v. KachmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Harris v. DeFeliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Gillingham v. PatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Dandridge v. Exhibitors Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API