Legal Opinion

Carruth v. Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1949No. 2730PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Cecil Carruth had' some buildings erected and repaired by J. D. Cottle and Roy Kirk, contractors. Cottle and Kirk obtained materials for the buildings from Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Company for which it was not paid and it sued Carruth and Cottle and Kirk.

Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Company; hereinafter called Valley, in the first count of its amended petition,, sued Cottle and Kirk on an open account for goods, wares and merchandise sold to Cottle and Kirk, who were alleged to be building contractors working for Carruth'. Valley sought judgment against Cottle and Kirk…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Brooks v. Buckley & BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bernard Johnson, Inc. v. Continental Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Stanford v. Dairy Queen Products of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Calvin v. KOLTERMANN, INC. v. UNDERREAM PILING CO.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Corpus Christi v. Acme Mechanical Cont., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  5. Rupe Inv. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API