Legal Opinion

Lovering v. Erie Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 226PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The plaintiffs in this case, George Lovering and Ethel Lovering, his wife, carried an insurance policy which provided that in the event the insured were injured in an automobile accident, the insurance company (Erie Indemnity) would pay them “any uncollectible valid legal claim” (up to $20,000) as the result of damages suffered at the hands of a “financially irresponsible uninsured” motorist.

On December 9, 1960, the Loverings, while in their automobile; were.-injured through , the alleged negligence of another motorist, Theodore Burns. -They brought a trespass…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Ondick v. OndickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Houghton, Mary D. v. American Guaranty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Rampy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sturkie v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Stock v. ArnottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API