People v. Acosta
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
*456*702Ralph Acosta, Jr., appeals aspects of his sentence for his convictions for committing a lewd or lascivious act on a child under the age *703of 14 and for contacting a minor with the intent to commit a sexual offense. He contends that: (1) the sentence imposed for contacting a minor with the intent to commit a sexual offense should have been stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 6541 because he harbored the same intent and objective for both crimes of conviction; (2) his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to object to the sexual offender fines imposed by the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. WalzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Aguil CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Alvarado CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Charles CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Donovan CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Eagle CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.