Legal Opinion
Medina v. Fuller
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1998No. 18,070PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, J.
{1} The Tort Claims Act defines scope of duties as “performing any duties that a public employee is requested, required or authorized to perform by the governmental entity, regardless of the time and place of performance.” NMSA 1978, § 41-4-3(G) (1995). Defendant, a Doña Ana County Deputy Sheriff, was on her way home from work on July 2, 1993, in her sheriffs assigned, unmarked police unit when she was in an accident with Plaintiff. Plaintiffs first attorney (not her current attorney) filed suit more than two years after the accident. If Defendant was in the scope of her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Gail D. Konradi, Personal Representative of the Estate of Glenn J. Konradi v. United States of America and Robert E. FarringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Clickner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Celaya v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Lessard v. Coronado Paint & Decorating Center, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Blea v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Seeds v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.