Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City Council
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} The issue presented in this appeal is whether NMSA 1978, Section 56 — 8—4(D) (2004), bars an award of post-judgment interest against the state and its political subdivisions when a plaintiff successfully establishes the deprivation of a federally protected constitutional right in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) (Section 1983). If post-judgment interest is not barred, we must determine whether federal law or state law establishes the proper rate of interest. We conclude that the state and its political subdivisions are not exempt from post-judgment interest…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arquette v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Albuquerque Commons P'ship v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Ping Lu v. Education Trust BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Texasfile LLC v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of the Cnty. of LeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- GEA Integrated Cooling Technology v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.