Legal Opinion

Mack v. General Electric Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 69-2653PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*369MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

This is a motion to intervene filed by the International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO-CLC (IUE) and its Local 119. The motion was filed approximately four and a half years after the commencement of this action, and after the parties submitted a proposed consent decree to the court for approval. Both plaintiffs and defendant oppose this motion, primarily on the basis of untimeliness.

Under F.R.Civ.P. 24, a motion to intervene must be timely, regardless of whether intervention is sought as of right [24(a)] or by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Hoots v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Hoots v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Culbreath v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Usery v. BrandelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  3. Montgomery County v. Ian Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Dodson v. SalvittiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Abbotts Dairies Division of Fairmont Foods, Inc. v. ButzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API