Legal Opinion
Dodson v. Salvitti
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1977No. Civ. A. No. 74-1854PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Proposed intervenors claim a right to intervene in this litigation pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 24(a)(2) which requires “an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action.” They contend that they have a substantial interest in the protection of their property from alleged economic loss resulting from the introduction of subsidized low income housing into their neighborhood. The motion to intervene was denied. The proposed intervenors’ interest does not relate “to the property or transaction which is the subject of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- Mack v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- East Powelton Concerned Residents v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Society Hill Civic Ass'n v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Wade v. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Society Hill Civic Association v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington HeightsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Wade v. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.