Legal Opinion

Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 2009No. Civil Action No. 04-363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge.

Pending before the court is an emergency motion to stay (Doc. No. 394) filed by defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”). UPS seeks to stay (Doc. No. 379) this court’s order requiring in camera review of certain documents (the “withheld documents”) pending appeal of that order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. For the reasons set forth below and as more fully set forth on the record at the hearing held April 23, 2009, the court will deny the motion to stay until the special master’s report and recommendation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Kounelis v. SherrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. Scott v. IBM Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  4. Barsoum v. NYC Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Winters v. Textron, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Ogden v. All-State Career SchoolDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Hogan v. Raymond Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. DONOFRIO v. IKEA US RETAIL, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Jane Doe v. Loyalsock Township School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API