Johnson v. Gunn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the defendant, as county auditor of Napa County, to draw a warrant upon the county treasurer for the sum of fifty-five dollars in payment of the salary of plaintiff, for his services in criminal cases, as justice of the peace of Yount Township of that county for the month of January, 1903. The defendant refused to draw such warrant for a sum exceeding thirty dollars as the full salary for that month. Judgment was given in the court below in favor of the defendant upon a demurrer to the complaint.
The question raised is whether the salary of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- County of Madera v. GendronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Frank v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Foucht v. HirniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.