Legal Opinion
Maldonado v. Metra
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 1, 1990No. 89 C 469PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the defendant, Metra, for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Augusto Maldonado. For the following reasons, the court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part.
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brewer v. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Limes-Miller v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Breech v. Alabama Power Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1997
- Damato v. Jack Phelan Chevrolet Geo, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Hubbard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.