Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Rogers

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 13, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract to recover $3,500 alleged to be due as rent under a written lease. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, and no question as to the form of pleading was raised. The plaintiff requested the judge to rule (1) “That upon the admitted facts and inferences to be drawn therefrom the plaintiff is entitled to recover”; and (2) “That under the extension of the lease the defendant, Jennie W. Rogers, remained bound by all the covenants of the lease and the extension thereof.” The judge denied these requests, and ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. MaykelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Shannon v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. 68 Beacon Street, Inc. v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Carlton Chambers Co. v. TraskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Cloverdale Co. v. LittlefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Maybury Shoe Co. v. IzenstattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Meredith v. DardarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Net Realty Holding Trust v. GianniniMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API