Legal Opinion

Maybury Shoe Co. v. Izenstatt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 8, 1946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This action of contract is brought to recover from the defendant damages for the alleged breach of -an implied covenant not to impair the obligation of an assignment of a lease. The case was heard by a judge sitting without a jury. He found for the defendant. The plaintiff having failed through inadvertence to except seasonably to the refusal of the judge to rule that “on all the evidence the . plaintiff is entitled to recover,” the judge reported the case for determination by this court.

The material facts disclosed by the report follow. On January 23, 1930, the Rochester Factory Holding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Atlantic Maritime Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Nelson Theatre Co. v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Goward v. WatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Montuori v. BailenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. New England Factors, Inc. v. GenstilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Lindsey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Tage II Corp. v. Ducas (U.S.) Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Gainsboro v. ShafferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API