Legal Opinion
Castle v. Double Time, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 1986No. 61815PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Two issues are presented: [1] Did the trial court err in admitting into evidence unsigned substitute documents that were offered to prove the contents of the lost original documents? and [2] In the face of the landlord’s objection, did the subtenant alone — without being joined by the tenant — have the power to exercise an option to extend the lease for an additional period? Our answer to the first question is in the negative and to the second in the affirmative.
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
The landlord leased certain commercial real estate to the tenant for a five-year term with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Chalkley v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Bevelheimer v. GierachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Kaybill Corp., Inc. v. CherneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Apc Operating Partnership v. Dale G. MacKey and Evelyn C. MacKey and Darrell E. MacKey and Lovell H. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- In re PampoukidisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Beattie v. STATE EX REL. GRDASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.