Legal Opinion
Shannon v. Jacobson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugo, C.J.
This is an action of summary process, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of a store. The case was tried in the Superior Court without a jury.. “Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law” by the trial judge are incorporated in the bill of exceptions and thus are a part of the record. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway, 235 Mass. 482, 495. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co. 243 Mass. 133, 135.
These findings of fact must be accepted as true. No evidence is reported. Norton v. Musterole Co. Inc. 235 Mass. 587, 589. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co. 246 Mass. 139, 143.
The material facts are…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Leavitt v. MaykelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Mutual Paper Co. v. Hoague-Sprague Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Levin v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Marble v. Town of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Markey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.