Legal Opinion

State v. Higginbotham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1991No. 89-0884-CRPublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review of a court of appeals' decision which reversed the circuit court's judgment convicting the defendant, Brian J. Higginbotham (Higginbotham), on his no-contest plea to the charge of arson, party to the crime. The court of appeals held that evidence seized in the search of Higginbotham's home and automobile should have been suppressed because the warrant-issuing judge did not have a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to issue the warrant. In view of our strong preference for search warrants and the great deference we accord to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  3. State v. MultalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MechtelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API