Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Baugh
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 20, 1997No. 97-70004PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on defendant Chrysler Corp.’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a response to which defendant has replied. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs, and the decisional process will not be aided by oral arguments. Therefore, pursuant to E.D.Mich. Local R. 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
II. BACKGROUND
Defendant James Baugh is a Chrysler Corporation retiree…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Michigan Department of Treasury v. MichalecDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Abbott v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Abbott v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State Treasurer v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.